<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Elliott Back's Blog - Latest Comments in Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottbacksblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:04:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/optimizing-wordpress-performance-speed/#comment-4858582</link><description>SEO is very good to get best rank in search engine but need to spend long time to get best result. Patient also is important thing and must do more study about the SEO optimizing. If you are really master on SEO its like you can easy success on what ever blog platform you create beside the wordpress</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/optimizing-wordpress-performance-speed/#comment-3193711</link><description>i try it soon</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fighting</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/optimizing-wordpress-performance-speed/#comment-3193710</link><description>Actually, they did as of late 2006.  You can &lt;a href="http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/4511" rel="nofollow"&gt;view the changeset&lt;/a&gt; on the Wordpress bug tracker.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elliott Back</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:03:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/optimizing-wordpress-performance-speed/#comment-3193709</link><description>Then, why don't they include this in the core code?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hm2k</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/optimizing-wordpress-performance-speed/#comment-3193704</link><description>Outsourcing static content delivery (including JavaScripts, Style sheets etc) to low cost CDN's is always a good way to make your wordpress blog perform faster and provide better user experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CDN Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:08:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/optimizing-wordpress-performance-speed/#comment-3193703</link><description>well... I decided to drop in your updated wptexturize as a test, and it SEEMS like my overall blog performance is much better than it was previously. I know you were saying that performance gains would likely not be noticeable, but from everything I can tell, it really helped with some sluggishness I was experiencing here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">technabob</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Optimizing Wordpress Performance &amp;#038; Speed</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/optimizing-wordpress-performance-speed/#comment-3193702</link><description>(while i don't know/dont want to learn much about lightpress's core)&lt;br&gt;what results would lightpress's 2.0 beta offer in such a test? i have no idea what amount of work this test took you, but maybe you want to provide the same infos on lightpress - so that i could compare.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>