Elliott Back's Blog - Latest Comments in Mint 2.0: Pirate Version

Re: Mint 2.0: Pirate Version

Jonathan — Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:19:27 -0000

I just bought a 30$ license of mint...

If this system where to be used... I would not only uninstall this product from my website, but also make another concurrent product, in GPL.

Also, I would make so much bad press to mint that his sales would drop...

Do you know why ? Because I think it's utterly wrong to track downloads like this.
Also, I work really hard to bring gpl-licensed javascript products to the masses, hundreds of hours of work.
To find what ? the "upper-cool" stats system out there is closed source, wanting to track me down if I ever want to crack it (which I won't do, I'm against it). Nah, too much for me.

Re: Mint 2.0: Pirate Version

Alister Cameron, Blog Coach — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:29:35 -0000

Steganographically - now there's a word you don't see every day!

I can say it but I sure have no idea what it means :)

- Alister

Re: Mint 2.0: Pirate Version

TeesMyBody.com T-Shirts — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:44:27 -0000

It's like he's painting himself in a corner. Share the wealth.

Bob Hasko
www.TeesMyBody.com T-Shirts

Re: Mint 2.0: Pirate Version

Montoya — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:37:23 -0000

This makes me wonder if Inman is interested in doing anything to improve his code. He has a very "Apple" way of doing things that irks me a lot.

Re: Mint 2.0: Pirate Version

Computer Guru — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:09:00 -0000

I personally have no use for a product whose developer refuses to make compatible with IIS. All it needs are a couple of changes here & a couple of changes there, but if he doesn't want to change it, Mint's not worthy of my money.