DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Elliott Back's Blog is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Elliott Back's Blog

Jump to original thread »
Author

Mint 2.0: Pirate Version

Started by elliottback · 8 months ago

No excerpt available. Jump to website »

5 comments

  • Computer Guru

    2 years ago

    I personally have no use for a product whose developer refuses to make compatible with IIS. All it needs are a couple of changes here & a couple of changes there, but if he doesn't want to change it, Mint's not worthy of my money.
    reply
  • Montoya

    2 years ago

    This makes me wonder if Inman is interested in doing anything to improve his code. He has a very "Apple" way of doing things that irks me a lot.
    reply
  • TeesMyBody.com T-Shirts

    2 years ago

    It's like he's painting himself in a corner. Share the wealth.

    Bob Hasko
    www.TeesMyBody.com T-Shirts
    reply
  • Alister Cameron, Blog Coach

    2 years ago

    Steganographically - now there's a word you don't see every day!

    I can say it but I sure have no idea what it means :)

    - Alister
    reply
  • Jonathan

    1 year ago

    I just bought a 30$ license of mint...

    If this system where to be used... I would not only uninstall this product from my website, but also make another concurrent product, in GPL.

    Also, I would make so much bad press to mint that his sales would drop...

    Do you know why ? Because I think it's utterly wrong to track downloads like this.
    Also, I work really hard to bring gpl-licensed javascript products to the masses, hundreds of hours of work.
    To find what ? the "upper-cool" stats system out there is closed source, wanting to track me down if I ever want to crack it (which I won't do, I'm against it). Nah, too much for me.
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login