<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Elliott Back's Blog - Latest Comments in Leveraging the Sharing Culture</title><link>http://elliottbacksblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:34:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Leveraging the Sharing Culture</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/leveraging-the-sharing-culture/#comment-3193283</link><description>I beg to differ, on multiple points. A revenue based on corporate branding and mainstream adoption would kill off nearly all non-pop artists. Sure, Sum41 and Beyonce would still rake in the cash - as thats what the populace likes to listen to (and thus what companies would want to form ties with.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the bands that are a bit of a more acquired taste would be left in the dust by such a revenue stream. Modern jazz fusion groups, French skaa bands, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So while the rich bands would benefit, you'd eliminate 95% of all musical talent on the scene.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julien McArdle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leveraging the Sharing Culture</title><link>http://elliottback.com/wp/leveraging-the-sharing-culture/#comment-3193282</link><description>it's not even a choice, at times. Here in Australia, a new CD can cost $30. For what? One good song? That's not my idea of a well-designed consumer product...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cibbuano</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>